Liquid History – Exploring South Australia's past, a pint at a time


The "Spanish 'Flu" and closing South Australian pubs, 1918-1920

To curb the spread of the COVID-19 virus, on 22 March 2020 the Australian "National Cabinet" recommended restrictions on non-essential public gatherings including the closure of pubs, until further notice, across Australia. In South Australia the restrictions were implemented under the state's Emergency Management Act the following day. This is, I believe, the first time that any South Australian government has so broadly proscribed pubs for any reason and invites comparison with what happened during previous national health emergencies, particularly the so-called "Spanish 'Flu" of 1918-20.

The "Spanish 'Flu" was not the first nor is it the only lethal influenza-related pandemic. It is, however, generally regarded as the worst by any measure. This was the "mother of all pandemics", exceptional in both breadth and depth: it affected all corners of the globe, infecting about one third of the world's population and killing between 20 and 100 million. This represented a mortality rate among the infected of between 1% and 2.5% compared to 0.1% for recent influenza pandemics [1].

The first case of "Spanish 'Flu" in Australia was identified in early October 1918. The first notification of the disease in South Australia was on 18 January 1919. By the time the influenza had run its course, by early-mid 1920, an estimated 11,552 deaths had been reported nationally (a per-capita mortality rate of 2.12%) and 540 deaths in South Australia (1.18%) [2].

Australia, and South Australia in particular, therefore fared much better than the rest of the world. Then as now, South Australia's relatively low infection and mortality rates were probably as much the benefit of the state's isolation, its few points of entry and its low population as much as the official public health measures or advances in medical science. As the British science journalist, Laura Spinney, has pointed out recently, that without a vaccine, "what do we have? We have strategies of containment, strategies that are collectively known as social distancing. And those are surprisingly unchanged since 1918, or even since much, much before that." [3] The South Australian government effectively assumed responsibility for public health, including the control of epidemics, with the Public Health Act of 1873. Since then, through at least seven major influenza pandemics [4], official responses have comprised more or less the same basic elements: quarantine (this and related powers were eventually assumed by the Commonwealth in 1908) and closing of state borders, isolation, mandatory notification, inoculation against complementary diseases such as pneumonia, public health programs that emphasised personal hygiene and protection (ie masks) and, above all, what we now call "social distancing". For the worst of the pandemics, "social distancing" has been enforced by the closure of places in which people habitually congregate, including, in some States of Australia, pubs.


The "Quarantine Camp" on the Jubilee Oval, Adelaide, March 1919
The "camp" was established in March 1919 to quarantine arrivals by train, mostly from Melbourne, less so from Perth; (maritime arrivals were quarantined temporarily on the ships, or on Torrens Island); the tents housed men, women were accommodated in sheds on the same site. Jubilee Oval was part of the Royal Agricultural and Horticultural Society of South Australia's show grounds, now the north-eastern corner of the University of Adelaide. The photograph was taken looking north from approximately behind Elder Hall; Frome Road is on the right, the River Torrens on the left. The nearest pub was about half a kilometre away. [SLSA PRG 280/1/9/374]


Closing the pubs

In 1919 the authority in matters of public health was vested in the state parliaments, excepting only the Commonwealth's quarantine and immigration powers. As Humphrey McQueen has shown [5], after the failure in November 1918 to coordinate across the Commonwealth measures to restrict the spread of the disease, the states more or less went their own ways, including in the regulation of "social distancing" and including whether or not they closed pubs.

On 3 February 1919 New South Wales proclaimed that "all premises licensed for the sale of liquor within the county of Cumberland [effectively all metropolitan Sydney] shall be closed and kept closed for the sale or consumption of liquor until a further order shall be made." Victoria followed on 11 February, closing all hotels and registered clubs within a radius of 15 miles (24 kilometres) of the Elizabeth Street Post Office. On 11 August, Tasmania also closed its public houses and restricted the number of resident patrons who could be in a hotel bar to two and the time they could remain there to five minutes. Western Australia did not close pubs unless they were the source of a serious outbreak as happened to two 'hotels' in the notorious Hannan Street, Kalgoorlie, in early July 1919; the Moora Hotel in Bunbury was also closed on 15 August 1919 but to establish a temporary quarantine station. Queensland does not seem to have closed its licensed presmises.

The South Australian government and its public health authorities also seemed confident that closing the state's borders and then quarantine (of the 'suspected') and isolation (of the infected) were sufficient to contain the disease and that the more extreme measures enacted in New South Wales and Victoria were unnecessary. Moreover, as far as I have been able to determined, there appears to have been no serious discussion in Parliament and little in the press about the effectiveness of these or alternative measures such as regulation of "social distance" in general or closing the pubs in particular. In South Australia in 1918-1920, pubs were not, it seems, regarded as a hazard to public health.

Despite the ravages of the "Spanish 'Flu", the South Australian government did not close the pubs, at least not for medical reasons.


Returning soldiers at Outer Harbour, 1919 [SLSA PRG PRG-280-1-22-114]

The real threat to public health was the repatriation of Australian soldiers from Britain and Europe, coincidentally at about the same time as the outbreak of the 'Spanish Influenza'. Understandably, the authorities were reluctant to link the introduction and transmission of the disease to the home-coming of Australia's national heroes. However, from October 1918, when the outbreak was declared an epidemic, the Commonwealth Director of Quarantine, Dr J H L Gumpston [6] automatically quarantined all ships entering Australian ports, including returning hospital and troop ships, generally for between 4 and 7 days.

The War Precautions Regulations and South Australian pubs


Notification of the first closure of all pubs under the War Precautions Regulations in Adelaide on 7 September 1917. (Click to enlarge) Register, 6 September 1917

Under the War Precautions Regulations 1915-1918 the federal government progressively expanded its powers over the prosecution of the war on the 'home front', including, on 19 May 1915, the regulation of licensed premises and control of the supply of liquor and, on 17 February 1916, the specific power to close licensed premises [7]. On 28 May 1917 an Executive Order transferred authority under the War Precautions Regulations from the Minister of Defence to the military District Commandants and vested them with discretionary power to close all licensed premises within a prescribed area on the arrival or departure of troop or other military transports or hospital ships at most Australian ports [8].

Although the military authorities ordered individual hotels such as the Black Swan on North Terrace to close as early as 14 July 1917 [9], as far as I have been able to determine, the power to close all pubs under the War Precautions (Liquor) Regulations was first exercised in South Australia on 25 August in Port Pirie and then in Adelaide on 8 September 1917 [10]. The last instance seems to have been on 19 September 1919 in Adelaide [11]. Over that period the two military District Commandants - Brigadier-General J. K. Forsyth, 1917-1918, and Brigadier-General J. M. Antill, 1918-1920 - closed Adelaide's pubs no fewer than 29 times, over an area ranging from ten to twenty-five miles (15 to 40 kilometres) radius from the GPO and for periods ranging from, effectively, one to three days. Additionally, on 20 July 1918, Antill ordered the closure of all pubs in South Australian towns in which trains carrying troops stopped, from an hour before the expected arrival of the train until they had left [12]. On 13 March 1919 Antill closed nine hotels for over a week for non-compliance with the War Precautions Regulations [13] and, on 19 July 1919, given "irrefutable evidence" that intoxicating liquor had been supplied to soldiers, he closed the Port Hotel (long since demolished) at Port Adelaide for "the whole period of demobilisation" [14]. All pubs were closed under other War Precautions Regulations on 20 December 1917 for the second conscription plebiscite [15]. The State Government closed pubs on the 19 July 1919 for the celebration of Peace Day [16].

The District Commandants therefore did what the civil authorities did not: they closed Adelaide's pubs, but for military, not medical reasons.

The military authorities continued to regulate the opening hours of pubs and the supply of liquor well after the formal end of hostilities in June 1919 and therefore well after the military need for such measures. This was possibly in order to maintain the "health, training, discipline or administration" of a military force in case of civil unrest or simply because of Antill's Prohibitionist sympathies. Certainly the closure of pubs in 1918-19 does not appear to have been primarily intended to curb the spread of influenza by enforced 'social distancing'; soldiers were free to worship together in churches, attend theatres, socialise at the Cheer Up Hut, etc where they would have been equally susceptible to contracting the disease or infecting others. They were simply prevented from drinking. On the other hand, as Forsyth's testimony to a Senate Select Committee in Adelaide on 12 March 1918 made clear, the primary objective of the District Commandants in exercising the relevant powers was to prevent soldiers' intoxication, drunken behaviour and therefore, by implication, promiscuity [17]. Similarly, on 28 April 1919, Antill argued that the closure of pubs was the main disincentive for returned soldiers to break quarantine [18]. If the closure of pubs in 1918-19 was in any way a public health measure, it was more likely directed not against influenza but venereal disease [19].



"Social distancing""? Soldiers queuing outside Queen's Hall theatre, December 1918
Queen's Hall was in Grenfell Street, Adelaide, approximately where Regent Arcade now stands. The Sturt Arcade Hotel stood next door. The [light-blue] arm-bands indicated that the wearer was a returned or invalided soldier to whom the supply of liquor was prohibited. [SLSA PRG-280-1-15-1053]

Returned soldiers 'parading' in front of the Cheer Up Hut, 1919
Opened in November 1915, the Adelaide Cheer Up Hut was located immediately behind Old Parliament House. It was meant to offer a morally safe alternative to city hotels. [SLSA B-50253]


The War Precautions Regulations and the "Spanish 'Flu" were not the worst problems confronting South Australian pubs at the end of the War. The South Australian Branch of the Licensed Victuallers' Association (SALVA), representing over 98% of South Australian licensees, generally accepted if not actively supported the measures taken by the government and military authorities, at least for the duration of the War. Publicans could hardly have done otherwise without inviting prosecution. Notwithstanding the temporary closure of pubs when troop ships or trains were in transit and the forceable and prolonged closure of the nine 'delinquent' pubs in March 1919 [13], as far as I have been able to determine, no South Australian publican was actually charged under the War Precautions Regulations for supplying soldiers with alcohol. Likewise, despite complaints that the War Precautions Regulations "inflicted a severe hardship upon hotel-keepers who were... [still] compelled to meet their liabilities in the shape of rents, wages, &c." [20], as far as I have been able to determine, only one hotel-keeper was declared insolvent from 1918 to 1920 [21]. Similarly, according to the Chief Licensing Inspectors' reports, the number of hotels in the Adelaide licensing district fell by only 7 (from 374 to 367) from March 1918 to March 1921 [22], all of which can be explained, not by the wartime regulations, nor because of the "Spanish 'Flu", but by delicensing of hotels by the Licensing Court in October 1920 [23]. But that's another story...

As was required under the initial legislation, the War Precautions Act and most of the Regulations were repealed within six moths of the declaration of peace, on 2 December 1920 [24]. Interestingly, however, the War Precautions Act Repeal Act preserved the power of the Governor-General, for example, to arbitrarily proclaim the closure of pubs and other licensed premises. This power was not revoked until 1973.




















[Evening Journal, 15 January 1900]

Notes

1 Jeffery Taubenberger and David Morens, "1918 Influenza: the mother of all pandemics", Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 12, No. 1, January 2006 Also Jeffery Taubenberger, "Chasing the elusive 1918 virus: preparing for the future by examining the past," in Stacey Knobler et al, The Threat of Pandemic Influenza: Are We Ready?, 2005, 69-89
2 Mayumi Kako et al, "The Spanish influenza of 1918-1919: the extent and spread in South Australlia" in Australasian epidemiologist, 2015, Vol. 22.1; Frank Bongiorno, "How Australia's response to the Spanish flu of 1919 sounds warnings on dealing with coronavirus", The Conversation,, March 22 2020; Humphrey McQueen, "The 'Spanish' influenza pandemic in Australia, 1912-1919", Social policy in Australia, some perspectives, 1901-1976, 1976, 131-147, republished by the Honest History network
The Australian Bureau of Statistics' Year Book Australia for 1920 includes a contemporary statistical analysis of the influenza pandemic in Australia.
3 Laura Spinney, "Coronavirus: what might we learn from pandemics in the past?" BBC History Extra podcast, (transcript) 16 March 2020
4 Since 1890, Australia has experienced at least seven severe influenza pandemics: the "Russian 'Flu (1890-1891), the "Spanish 'Flu" (1918-1920), the "Asian 'Flu" (1957-1958), the "Hong Kong 'Flu" (1968-1969), another "Russian 'Flu" (1977-1978), the H1N1/09 "Swine 'Flu" (2009-2010) and now the COVID19 pandemic (2019-?).
Before the "Spanish 'Flu" in 1918, there were also at least four less serious influenza 'epidemics' that were relatively easily contained and since 1920 there have been 'outbreaks' of novel strains of influenza, such as the Australian "Equine 'Flu" of 2007, that did not progress to become pandemics. In addition, less virulent and lethal strains of influenza are endemic in the Australian population. Australian public health measures have also been developed over the same period during periodic outbreaks of other diseases such as smallpox, cholera, typhoid, syphilis, tuberculosis, diphtheria, poliomyelitis, measles and rubella, hepatitis, AIDS and, perhaps above all, the bubonic plague of 1900 which,
Ian Townsend claims, was responsible for the public health systems we know today.
5 Humphrey McQueen, "The 'Spanish' influenza pandemic in Australia, 1912-1919", Social policy in Australia, some perspectives, 1901-1976, 1976, 131-147, republished in Honest History, nd
6 J H L Gumpston, Influenza and maritime quarantine in Australia, 1919
7 Provisional Regulations under the War Precautions Act, 1914-1915, section 12; Register, 20 May 1915, p.6; Daily Herald, 18 February 1916, p.5
8 Mail 2 June 1917, p.7 Daily Herald, 30 October 1915, p.5
9 Daily Herald, 14 July 1917, p.3
10 Port Pirie Recorder..., 25 August 1917, p.3; Register, 6 September 1917, p.8; Express and Telegraph> 6 September 1917, p.2
11 Register, 19 September 1919, p.2
12 Daily Herald, 20 July 1918, p.4
13 Register,14 March 1919, p.7
14 Journal, 18 July 1919, p.23
15 War Precautions (Liquor) Regulations, 24 October 1916; Daily Herald, 20 December 1917, p.3
16 Chronicle, 19 July 1919, p.35
17 Observer, 16 March 1918, p.20
18 Register, 28 April 1919 p.4
19 Susan Lemar, "'Outweighing the Public Weal': The Venereal Diseases Debate in South Australia 1915-1920," Health and History, vol.5, no.1, 2003, pp.90-114
20 Register, 20 March 1919, p.8
21 Statistical Register of South Australia, 1919, Part II, p.6
22 Advertiser, 5 March 1919, p.8; Express and Telegraph, 1 March 1921, p.1
23 Express and Telegraph, 28 October 1920, p.1 Twelve city hotels were delicensed by the Licensing Court on this occasion. There was, therefore, effectively a nett increase in the number of pubs in the Adelaide metropolitan area; to be investigated.
24 War Precautions Act Repeal Act, 1920; see especially Section 22.



Left: Australian archetypes meet over beers in a pub, 1917; Anzac Bulletin, no,32, p.3, 15 August 1917

Above: May Gibbs: Hullo! How are you? Illustration for a public health poster, 1919
Posted: 1 May 2020. Original content © Craig Hill 2020.